|
The
Guardian February 7, 2002
Download
article
The
man to see about a horse
Greg
Wood meets the founder of Thoroughbred Genetics Ltd.
It is less than 50 miles
from the Sittingbourne Research Centre to the winning post at Epsom, the
"piece of wood" which the great breeder Federico Tesio once
described as the basis of the thoroughbred's very existence, but it feels more
like 500. The precise rows of dozens of identical low-rise labs and offices
are a world away from the wild excesses of Derby day.
Yet there is one hi-tech start-up here with its roots in the turf. At 10/26
Innovations Buildings, Dr Steve Harrison is on the same quest as Tesio, and
hosts of thoroughbred breeders before and since. At its end, as always, is
that mythical beast, the perfect racehorse and stallion.
Not that you will find any horses on SRC property. That would be far too
old-economy. Harrison is a geneticist and the founder of the Thoroughbred
Genetics Company Limited, which gives clients the chance to rely on something
more than pedigrees and prayer, and test their prospective purchases at a
molecular level.
"Given that the racing industry is founded entirely on genetics,"
Harrison says, "it's amazing that practically no one who is involved with
it is a geneticist."
Yet this is how it has always been. The science of genetics is 100 years old
but some breeders still rely on hunches, or rule-of-thumb theories with no
scientific basis, when they plan their matings. Yearlings, meanwhile, can be
knocked down for huge prices simply because they look good on paper.
Harrison does not promise certainty, or anything like. What he does offer is a
possible edge in a game of percentages, in which success may be the size of
your failure rate. For a few hundred pounds he will scan the chromosomal DNA
of a thoroughbred for about 50 different genetic markers, indicating the
amount of variability in its genetic make-up.
Horses which have a lot of variability (or are heterozygous, in technical
language) are, in genetic terms, considered more healthy than homozygous
animals, which show relatively little variability in their genes. However,
while heterozygous horses tend to be better athletes, there is a genetic
trade-off. At stud, that same variability makes it less likely they will pass
their excellence on to their offspring.
What Harrison attempts to find - or produce, by recommending matings to
breeders - are horses that tread a middle path, neither too homozygous or
heterozygous to be a worthwhile long-term investment.
"You can tell a certain amount from a pedigree," he says, "but
you can't tell how homozygous an individual is. It's hard to put an exact
value on it, but you can see a very homozygous horse from looking at the test.
"Breeding tends to be cyclical in that people will look at a pedigree and
think that it's inbred and decide to outcross, but sometimes you find that an
animal which looks inbred on pedigree isn't necessarily very homozygous, so it
gives you a chance to inbreed a bit more, within limits."
Confidentiality prevents Harrison from naming his clients, though he does say
that some of Europe's more "forward-thinking" racing and breeding
operations have come to him for genetic analyses. A year or so ago he advised
one client on a number of potential purchases, putting ticks against a couple
and a big cross against another despite an outstanding pedigree. The client
bought the lot anyway but Harrison notes that, while the ones he recommended
did well last season, the one he did not like has yet to see a track.
Sometimes, of course, there are other factors to consider. "We can make
recommendations," he says, "but what is genetically suitable will
sometimes be different from what is commercially suitable." In other
words, some breeders will use a particular stallion because they know his
offspring will sell at a premium, whatever it might do on the track.
Harrison's tests can have other uses too. "We dealt with someone just
recently," he says, "who was interested in a debate going back
almost 300 years. There are two families which trace back to mares which were
at Hampton Court in the early 1700s, but there's been a long debate about
whether there were really two mares, or just one."
Here, Harrison looked at a different form of DNA, called mDNA, which is handed
down almost unchanged through the female line across many generations. When he
tested the mDNA in modern-day representatives of the two families, he found
significant differences, showing that there were indeed two original mares,
not one. "This question had been bugging people for more than 250
years," he says, "but we could answer it in a few minutes with a
simple test."
Simple or not, Harrison's lab testifies to a thriving business. One machine,
which looks like a cross between a test-tube rack and an ice-cream maker, cost
almost £10,000, and that is one of the cheaper ones. Another £100,000-worth
will arrive in the next few months.
There are rich new markets to explore, too. "I'm very busy at the
moment," he says. "I'm having our website translated into
Arabic."
|